For Immediate Release, January 12, 2021
Erik Molvar, Western Watersheds Project, (307) 399-7910, email@example.com
Trump Administration Refuses to Address Significant Flaws in Greater Sage-grouse Plans
BOISE, Idaho— The Bureau of Land Management announced Monday that it is standing by its 2019 greater sage grouse land-use plans for seven western states, making no changes to the plans after reanalyzing them in supplemental environmental impact statements.
In 2019 a federal judge found the plans to be deficient in numerous ways, and they’ve been enjoined ever since. The agency launched a supplemental review process in 2020 in an attempt to remedy those deficiencies and lift the injunction, but Monday’s announcement failed to acknowledge the fact that the 2015 Obama-era sage grouse plans remain in effect.
“Rather than actually address the problems of the flawed decisions, the Trump administration is doubling down on its 2019 plans, allowing state politics to dictate federal sage grouse conservation,” said Erik Molvar, executive director of Western Watersheds Project. “In the guise of collaborating with states, the Trump plans unjustifiably gutted sage grouse protections, gave away public-land resources to Big Oil and Big Ag, and ignored the long-term consequences. State plans advocate protection levels much too weak to sustain sage grouse populations, let alone recover them to healthy levels, which is why a federal backstop became essential to achieve sage grouse conservation in the first place.”
To lift the injunction and implement the 2019 Trump plans, the agency would have to go back to the U.S. District Court in Idaho and persuade the judge that its supplemental analyses justify the original decisions. It’s unlikely that the federal government could reimplement the Trump administration’s 2019 gutting of sage grouse protections before Trump leaves office.
“This is a gratuitous, spiteful parting shot at the much-abused greater sage grouse from the most anti-conservation administration in history,” said Michael Saul, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The bright side is there’s no legal effect of this new action.”
The Bureau characterized the decisions as a “determination not to amend” the 2019 amendments.
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1.7 million members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
Western Watersheds Project is a nonprofit conservation organization with over 9,500 members dedicated to protecting and conserving the public lands and natural resources of watersheds in the American West.
Advocates for the West is a public interest environmental law firm winning for the West’s natural treasures and wildlife.