Subject: SW Biodiversity Alert #8
*** ***
Southwest Biodiversity Alert #8 *** ***
southwest center for
biological diversity
[email protected]
pob 17839, tucson, az
85731
SPOTTED OWL RECOVERY PLAN ALTERED TO ALLOW
SALVAGE LOGGING
IN ROADLESS AREA!
In what the newspapers have dubbed "owlgate," the U.S. Fish
and
Wildlife Service has admitted that it illegally changed the
Mexican
Spotted Owl Recovery Plan after the plan was officially
signed.
The change, deleting a prohibition against salvage logging
roadless
areas and steep slopes, came after the Gila National
Forest
pressured the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Mexican spotted
owl
Recovery Team to delete the prohibition. Internal computer
memos showed
that the Forest Service "aggressively pressured" the
Fish and Wildlife
Service to allow salvage in roadless and steep
slope areas when it became
evident that the prohibition would
preclude the HB Salvage Sale on the Gila
National Forest. At 10
million board ft, HB is the largest planned sale
in the Southwest.
Internal Forest Service memos stated that "HB will define
what the
region will be able to do in term of salvage. If we can't do
it
here,
we won't be able to do it anywhere." The HB area contains
10% of
all spotted owls on the Gila National Forest.
The head of the
Spotted Owl Recovery Team, a Forest Service
biologist, admitted that he made
the change unilaterally between the
signing and the printing of the
Plan. Other members of the
Recovery Team had not yet received the
printed copy of the Plan
even though it was finalized in October 1995.
Several were
incensed when told of the changes.
During the media
frenzy which placed owlgate on the front page of
newspapers throughout the
Southwest, the Regional Director of the
Fish and Wildlife Service admitted
that the HB fire was arson
caused. Up to that point the Forest Service
had managed to
successfully suppress the fire investigation
results.
Following the revelation of owlgate, environmentalists
filed
motions with a federal court requesting that they be allowed
to
access to Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service documents
and be
given the right to interview agency biologists and
bureaucrats. We
presented evidence showing that owlgate is part
of a continuing effort on the
part of the agencies to circumvent a
federal court order which has placed an
injunction on timber harvest
in the Arizona and New Mexico since August of
1995.
Write: Nancy Kaufman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500
Gold
Ave. SW, Albuquerque, NM 87102. Tell her to restore
the
prohibition against logging in roadless areas and steep slopes to
the
Recovery Plan.
Write: Able Camerina, Gila National Forest,
3005 E. Camino del
Bosque, Silver City, NM 88061. Tell him not to log
the Eagle Peak
Roadless Area.
SUIT FILED TO LIST ALEXANDER ARCHIPELAGO
WOLF
AS ENDANGERED
The Biodiversity Legal Foundation, Southwest Center
for
Biological Diversity, Save America's Forests, Native Forest
Network
and others filed suit 2/7/96 against the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service for
denying a petition to list the Alexander
Archipelago wolf as an endangered
species. Endemic to the
Tongass National Forest, the AA wolf is
threatened by road
building, hunting, and the loss of its prey species due to
clear
cutting of old growth rainforests on the Tongass National
Forest.
Though the scientific data clearly indicates the wolf
warrants
listing
as endangered, the FWS denied the petition on the basis
that the
Tongass National Forest "promised" to develop adequate
protection
measures in the future. The agency used the same
blatantly illegal
argument to deny ESA protection to the Queen
Charlotte goshawk which ranges
from Southeast Alaska down the
Olympic Peninsula. That denial is being
litigated by the same
plaintiffs.
STUDY SAYS LARGE WILDFIRES MORE
LIKELY TO
RESTORE LANDSCAPES THAN SMALL PRESCRIBED
FIRES.
Baker,
W.L. 1994. Restoration of landscape structure altered by
fire
suppression. Conservation Biology 8(3):763-769. Used GIS-
based
simulation model to analyze effects of reinstating natural fire
regime in
Boundary Waters Canoe Area (MN) after 82 years of fire
suppression.
Concluded that landscapes heavily altered by fire
suppression can generally
be returned to natural structural condition
in 50-75 year by reinstating
natural fire regimes. "Unusually large
fires would probably hasten the
restoration of landscape structure,
while small prescribed fires will not
restore the landscape but
instead produce further
alteration."