PACIFIC SWORDFISH LONGLINING SHUT DOWN FROM HAWAII
TO CALIFORNIA, OREGON AND WASHINGTON
In
response to a court order obtained
by the Center
for Biological Diversity and Sea
Turtle Restoration
Network, the National Marine
Fisheries Service shut
down the U.S. swordfish longline
fishery between
Hawaii and the coasts of California,
Oregon and Washington
on 3-11-04. The
ban was implemented to save
endangered leatherback
and loggerhead sea turtles from
extinction. Longline
fishing, an industrial technology
that internationally
sets two billion hooks per year is
also the major
cause of the decline of large
predatory fish such
as swordfish, tuna and sharks, and
is responsible
for the death of hundreds of
thousands of seabirds
each year. U.S. longerlines
are responsible
for 5% of the hooks.
A previous lawsuit by the Restoration
Network shut
down the swordfish longline fishery in
Hawaii, but
the industry continued to operate by
moving its base
of operations to California.
Under industry lobbying pressure, the Bush administration
allowed the evasion by declaring that the fishery was exempt
from the Endangered
Species Act. The administration also ran roughshod over a
1993 international
agreement to stop the fishing industry from switching
registration from state
to state or nation to nation to avoid environmental laws.
The federal court,
however, ordered the administration to comply with the
Endangered Species Act,
eventually resulting in the decision to close the fishery.
The case was argued by Brendan Cummings of the Center for
Biological Diversity
and Debbie Sivas of EarthJustice.
UNITED NATIONS ASKED TO BAN PACIFIC
LONGLINING
A coalition
of conservation organizations and
scientists including
the Center for Biological Diversity
has called on
the United Nations to take immediate
steps to save
Pacific leatherback and loggerhead
turtles from extinction.
It is time for an international ban on
longline fishing
modeled after the 1991 U.N. High Seas
Driftnet Moratorium.
Several factors contribute to making
this moment
a pivotal one for saving these two
species of sea
turtles. Most
importantly, scientists agree that without dramatic,
coordinated, international
action both species will be extinct within 30 years. Two, the
American government,
under pressure from lawsuits is finally taking some initiative
on the turtles'
behalf by closing the California-based longline fishery, a major
contributor
to the turtles' decline. Three, the Bush administration is about
to reopen the
Hawaii-based long- line fishery. Finally, US-based fishing
fleets are only a
small part of the problem. Broad-based international cooperation
is necessary,
thus the appeal to the United Nations.
ALASKA SEA
OTTERS PROPOSED FOR ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
PROTECTION
In
response to a petition and lawsuit
by the Center
for Biological Diversity, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife
Service proposed to list the
Southwest Alaska sea
otter as an endangered species on
2-11-04.
Russian
and American fur trappers pushed
the sea otter
to the brink of extinction prior to
the 20th century.
After being protected by an
international treaty
in 1911, the species made a
remarkable comeback.
By 1985 the Southwest Alaska
population comprised
over 80% of the world's total sea
otter population.
In the past 18 years, however, its
population has
crashed from a high of about
90,000 to just a few
thousand. The cause of the decline
has not been
determined, but may be a cascading
ecological effect
from hunting of whales and sea
lions. As these
large mammals disappeared from the
food chain,
orcas may have been forced to
shift their hunting
to sea otters. Since sea otters
are the smallest
marine mammal, orcas have to catch
many more of
them to replace whales and sea
lions. The loss
of the sea otters, meanwhile, is
having its own
cascade effect by allowing sea
urchin populations
to rise and devastate kelp
beds.
The
suit was brought Brent Plater of the
Center for Biological
Diversity.
For
more information.
COURT SIDES WITH STEELHEAD TROUT AGAINST BUSH
ADMINISTRATION
On
5-18-04, a federal judge ruled that
California's
Central Valley steelhead trout
should remain under
the protection of the Endangered
Species Act while
its status is reviewed by the Bush
administration.
The administration is reviewing all
Pacific coast
salmon and steelhead to determine if
they should
remain on the endangered species
list in light of
the extensive hatchery raised fish
which hybridize
with them. While scientists
overwhelmingly view hatchery
fish as a threat to salmon and
steelhead, the administration
is seeking out an excuse to delist
or reduce protection
for the species.
Many
salmon and steelhead have been
delisted pending the
administration's review,
but the Center and other groups intervened on the Central
Valley steelhead's
behalf. In response, the judge found that "the scientific
evidence ... indicates
that the fish faces serious and irreparable harm if removed
from the list and
that, given its numbers, its listing is likely to be preserved
after the review
and update." Federal scientists have recommended that the
species uplisted
from a "threatened" to an "endangered"
species. Central Valley steelhead
trout have been lost from 95% of their historic habitat, and
continue to face
threats from unchecked water use, blockage by dams, urban
sprawl, and polluted
rivers.
The
Center for Biological Diversity, the Northern California
Council of the Federation
of Fly Fishers, Federation of Fly Fishers, Delta Fly Fishers,
Trout Unlimited,
Woodbridge Rivers Company, and Pacific Rivers Council were
represented by EarthJustice
in the proceedings.
PETITION
FILED TO LIST CHERRY POINT HERRING AS
ENDANGERED
On
1-21-04, the Center for Biological
Diversity, Ocean
Advocates and other environmental
groups submitted
a petition to NOAA Fisheries to
protect Puget Sound's
Cherry Point herring under the
Endangered Species
Act. Once Washington state's largest
herring population,
it has declined by 90% in the past
30 years due to
industrial development and
pollution.
The
Cherry Point herring is a distinct
population of
Pacific herring that spawns along
the open shoreline
north of Bellingham. Two major oil
refineries and
an aluminum smelter near Cherry
Point have directly
impacted its spawning grounds
through dock construction
and operation, outfall discharge,
vessel traffic,
and disease and foreign species
introduced from ship
ballast water. More than 70 spills
have dumped tens
of thousands of gallons of crude oil
and poisoned
water over the spawning grounds
since the Cherry
Point refineries were built in 1973.
One large oil
spill during spawning season could
completely wipe
out the population.
In
addition to the Center and Ocean
Advocates, the coalition
includes the Northwest Ecosystem
Alliance, Public
Employees for Environmental
Responsibility, People
For Puget Sound, and Friends of the
San Juans.
For
more information.
BUSH
ADMINISTRATION SUED FOR NOT PROTECTING WHITE
MARLIN
On
1-14-04, the Center for Biological
Diversity and
Turtle Island Restoration Network
file suit against
the Bush Administration for refusing
to list the
white marlin as an endangered
species. The white
marlin is a popular target of sport
fishers, but
they account for less than 1% of
marlin mortality
while bycatch by industrial scale
swordfish and tuna
longliners is responsible for over
99% of reported
marlin killings.
The
marlin has been reduced to just 6%
of its historic
range in the Atlantic Ocean. It has
steadily declined
by 3% per year since monitoring
began in the mid-1980s.
The Bush administration refused to
protect the marlin
even though its own scientists
declared that current
harvest levels are unsustainable and
that even under
the most optimistic management
scenarios, the species
would continue to decline to
dangerously low levels.
The
suit is being argued by Brendan
Cummings of the Center
for Biological Diversity and Jay
Tutchton of the
Center's
Environmental Law Clinic at the
University of Denver.
For
more information.
BUSH
ADMINISTRATION SUED FOR NOT PROTECTING HAWAIIAN FALSE KILLER
WHALES
On 11-20-03, the Center for Biological
Diversity, Turtle Island Restoration Network, and the Hawaii
community group Hui Malama i Kohola, filed suit against the Bush
administration for refusing to protect Hawai'i population of
false killer whales from destructive longline fishing. False
killer whales are routinely injured or killed when caught on the
miles of large hooks strung across the oceans by the commercial
tuna and swordfishing industry. The population has only 83
individuals and is being killed at nearly 20 times the rate
allowable for a sustainable population.
The
suit seeks to reclassify the false
killer whale from
a Category III status to a Category
I under the Marine
Mammal Protection Act. It is being
argued by Paul
Achitoff of Earthjustice (Honolulu).
Click
now and become a member of the Center
for Biological
Diversity, and ensure a future for
wildlife and habitat.
Center
for Biological Diversity | PO
Box 710 Tucson, AZ 85702 | 520-623-5252 | [email protected]
This message was sent to . Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from Center for Biological Diversity - Biodiversity Activist, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).
|